U.S. STRATEGY AND POLICY IN CENTRAL ASIA

Authors

  • Murat LAUMULIN D.Sc. (Political Science), chief research associate at the Institute of Strategic Research of Kazakhstan under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Author

Abstract

 It goes without saying that American geopolitics and geostrategy are of a genuinely global nature and affect practically every region and every country. And Central Asia is no exception in this respect. America’s influence there is of a multi-factoral and multi-level nature in every aspect—the political, military-strategic, economic, and ideological. From the very first days of independence, the Central Asian countries have been aware of America’s influence (and pressure) in essentially every sphere.

In Central Asia, America is confronted with other world centers of power (Russia, China, the EU, Iran, and other Islamic states), which explains the fairly frequent contradictions. American pol icy in Central Asia depends to a certain extent on Washington’s relations with these states, but it is not determined by them. On the whole, Central Asia’s policy is part of the U.S.’s broader Eurasian strategy, which covers the Caspian, the Caucasus, Russia, Afghanistan, the Middle East, South Asia, and China.

It should also be said that America’s Eurasian policy is part of Washington’s much broader global strategy designed to perpetuate America’s domination in the world economic and financial system and its military-strategic superiority. America is seeking greater geopolitical influence (in Eurasia among other places) and containment of potential rivals (China, the EU, and Russia), as  well as struggling against so-called international terrorism (for control over the Islamic world).

Central Asia is an important, but not the only, element of the U.S.’s global strategy. At the same time, it is critically important for the U.S.’s Eurasian geopolitics to establish control over Eurasia. For this reason, Central Asia’s role and importance for Washington will become even greater 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: “President Attends International Republican Institute Dinner,” available at [http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/

eleases/2005/05/20050518-2.html].

See: J.K. Davis, M.J. Sweeny, Central Asia on U.S. Strategy and Operational Planning: Where Do We Go From Here? IFRA, Washington, D.C., 2004.

See: M. Rywkin, Stability in Central Asia: Engaging Kazakhstan. A Report (with Policy Recommendations) on U.S.

nterests in Central Asia and U.S.-Kazakhstan Relations, NCAFP, New York, 2005; G.D. Schwab, M. Rywkin, Security and Stability in Central Asia: Differing Interests and Perspectives, NCAFP, New York, 2006.

See: F.S.E. Starr, A Greater Central Asia: Partnership for Afghanistan and Its Neighbors. The Central Asia-Cau-casus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center, Washington, DC, 2005.

See also: I. Zviagel’skaia, “Kliuchi ot schast’ia, ili Bol’shaia Tsentral’naia Azia,” Rossia v global’noy politike,Vol. 3, No. 4, 2005, pp. 88-93; F. Starr, “Partnerstvo dlia Tsentral’noy Azii,” Rossia v global’noy politike, Vol. 3, No. 4,2005, pp. 72-87.

Downloads

Published

2007-08-31

Issue

Section

U.S.’S POLICY IN CENTRAL EURASIA: SPECIFICS AND PROSPECTS

How to Cite

LAUMULIN, M. (2007). U.S. STRATEGY AND POLICY IN CENTRAL ASIA. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 8(4), 46-56. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1095

Plaudit