ON THE ROLE OF THE “CAUCASIAN TANDEM” IN GUAM
Abstract
The disintegration of the U.S.S.R. and collapse of the communist system made significant changes to the geopolitical map of the world. States with similar characteristics rooted in the relatively recent historical past have appeared in the post-Soviet expanse. These states do not have a multitude of state institutions and have inherited the distorted system of the command economy. Since they have no experience in state independence, these countries, in addition to the numerous unresolved domestic tasks, have also found themselves faced with problems caused by the expanding dimensions of globalization.
Globalization is characterized today by the creation of regional unions of states with similar interests, thus making it easier for these countries to reach common goals through joint efforts.
A variety of different regional unions of the former Soviet republics have formed in the territory of the disintegrated U.S.S.R. And it is interesting that these formations are far from al-ways limited to the post-Soviet expanse. On the contrary, it has become a priority for many of the former Union republics to become members of interstate unions that existed even before the collapse of the Soviet Union, such as NATO and the EU. Whereas this proved a very manageable task for the Baltic states, other countries are still encountering a multitude of obstacles and unresolved issues as they attempt to gain membership in these unions.
More than ten years ago, Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Moldova created the regional international organization called GUAM, which is an institutional entity designed to find common interests and coordinate joint action plans. The fact that this structure has existed for many years that each country individually, as well as the organization they represent as a whole still have many unresolved problems. At present, the question of strengthening and devel-oping GUAM is particularly urgent, and it is a priority not only for the states that belong to this structure, but also for the West, the interests of which in the post-Soviet expanse are largely related to the interests of GUAM.
GUAM’s development might be successfully promoted by means of the “Caucasian Tan-dem”1 of Azerbaijan and Georgia, which has al-ready largely shown its efficacy and efficiency in resolving many problems that affect the interests of these Caucasian republics.
Downloads
References
See:T.Beridze, E.Ismailov, V.Papava, Tsentral 'nyy Kavkaz i ekonomika Gruzii, Nurlan, Baku, 2004,pp. 42-44.
See, for example: R. Grinberg, L. Zevin, et al., 10 let Sodruzhestva nezavisimykh gosudarstv: illiuzii, razocharov-aniia, nadezhdy, RAS Institute of International Economics and Political Research, Moscow, 2001; L. Kozik, P. Kokhno,SNG: realii i perspektivy, Yuridicheskiy mir BK Publishing House, Moscow, 2001; V. Shulga (head of a group of au-thors), Ekonomika SNG: 10 let reformirnovaniia i integratsionnogo razvitiia, Finstatinform, Moscow, 2001; N. Shum-skiy, Sotrudnichestvo nezavisimykh gosudarstv: problemy i perspektivy razvitiia, Tekhnoprint, Minsk, 2001; idem, “Eko-nomicheskaia integratsiia gosudarstv Sodruzhestva: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy,” Voprosy ekonomiki, No. 6, 2003; idem,
Obshchee ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo gosudarstv Sodruzhestva: optimalny format,” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhd-unarodnye otnosheniia, No. 2, 2004.
See, for example: B. Coppieters, “The Failure of Regionalism in Eurasia and the Western Ascendancy over Russia’s Near Abroad,” in: Commonwealth and Independence in Post-Soviet Eurasia, ed. by B. Coppieters, A. Zverev,D. Trenin, FRANK CASS PUBLISHERS, London, 1998, pp. 194-197; M.B. Olcott, A. Åslund, Sh.W. Garnett, Getting it Wrong: Regional Cooperation and the Commonwealth of Independent States, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, 1999.
See: L. Vardomskiy, “Integratsionnyy proekt: byt’ ili ne byt’?” Novosti-Moldova Information Agency, 9 July,2007, available at [http://www.newsmoldova.ru/print_version.html?nws_id=634258].
See, for example: F. Cameron, J.M. Doma ski, “Russian Foreign Policy with Special Reference to its Western Neighbors,” EPC (European Policy Center) Issue Paper, No. 37, 2005, available at [http://www.epc.eu/TEWN/pdf/
_EPC%20Issue%20Paper%2037%20Russian%20Foreign%20Policy.pdf]; T. Liloyan, “Armenia-Russia’s Out-post in South Caucasus—Duma Speaker,” ArmenianDiaspora.com, 15 December, 2004, available at [http://www.
rmeniandiaspora.com/archive/16794.html].
See, for example: R. Ultanbaev, “Eurasian Economic Community: Thorny Path of Development,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 3 (21), 2003, pp. 135-137; idem, “Eurasian Economic Community in New Integration Condi-tions,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 4 (40), 2006, pp. 38-40.
See, for example: L. Vardomskiy, op. cit.
See: “Dlia chego nuzhen GUAM?” UNIAN, 19 May, 2006, available at [http://www.unian.net/news/print.
hp?id=155187].
See: F. Tolipov, “Russia in Central Asia: Retreat, Retention, Or Return?” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 5 (47),2007, p. 19.
See, for example: S. Shakariants, “Sanitarniy kordon protiv Rossii,” KVKZ.ru. Novosti Kavkaza, 29 June, 2007,available at [http://kvkz.ru/2007/06/29/sanitarnyjj_kordon_protiv_rossii.html].
See, for example: V. Yakubian, “GUAM protiv Rossii—bakinskiy raund,” REGNUM Information Agency, 23 June,2007, available at [http://www.regnum.ru/news/issues/847166.html].
See: “Ukraina: Rossia smirilas s sushchestvovaniem GUAM,” Noviy region 2, 16 June, 2007, available at [http://
ww.nr2.ru/pmr/124345.html].
See: “Dlia chego nuzhen GUAM?”
See: A. Getmanchuk, “Gensek GUAM Valeriy Chechelashvili: ‘Kazhdaia iz chetyrekh stran—lider,’” Glavred,18 June, 2007, available at [http://glavred.info/print.php?article=/archive/2007/06/18/171626-1.html].
See: “Nemtsov prognoziruet ekonomicheskoe razvitie stran ODER-GUAM,” ForUM, 24 May, 2005, available at [http://for-ua.com/ukraine/2006/05/24/161820.html].
See: V. Iakubian, op. cit.
See: L. Grigoriev, M. Salikhov, GUAM—piatnadtsat let spustia. Sdvigi v ekonomike Gruzii, Ukrainy, Azerbaid-zhana i Moldavii, 1991-2006, REGNUM, Moscow, 2007, p. 9, available at [http://www.fief.ru/content/32/1/GUAM.pdf].
See, for example: “GUAM—zona svobodnoi torgovli,” 24 May, 2006, available at [http://www.kroufr.ru/forum/
ndex.php?PHPSESSID=2549b383f4445d14978df84d46c00a55&topic=1285.msg3270#msg3270].
See: Communiqué of the GUAM Baku Summit, GUAM, 18 June, 2007, p. 3, available at [http://www.mfa.md/
mg/docs/baku_communique.doc].
See, for example: V. Stepanov, B. Burkinskiy, GUAM: problemy i perspektivy razvitiia v kontekste natsional-nykh interesov Ukrainy, Institute of Market Problems and Economic-Environmental Research, Ukrainian National Acade-my of Sciences, Odessa, 2001.
See: I. Aliev, Kaspiiskaia neft Azerbaidzhana, Izvestia Publishers, Moscow, 2003.
For more about this problem with respect to Ukraine, see, for example: R. Götz, “Ukraine and Belarus: Their Energy Dependence on Russia and their Roles as Transit Countries,” in: The New Eastern Europe: Ukraine, Belarus,Moldova, ed. by D. Hamilton, G. Mangott, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Washington, DC, 2007.
See, for example: Policymaking in the Open Economy. Concepts and Case Studies in Economic Performance,ed. by R. Dornbush, The World Bank, Washington, 1993.
See: A. Alesina, “It’s the Size of the Market, not the Country that Counts,” Project Syndicate, December 1998,available at [http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/ale1].
See: E. Shevardnadze, Great Silk Route. TRACECA-PETrA. Transport Corridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia. The Eurasian Common Market. Political and Economic Aspects, Georgian Transport System Ltd., Tbilisi, 1999.
See: F. Asadov, “Oil Caravans of the 21st Century on the Great Silk Road: What the Future has in Store for Az-erbaijan and Kazakhstan,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 6, 2000; H. Chase, “Future Prospects of Caucasian Energy and Transportation Corridor. The Role of Caucasian Energy Corridor in European Energy Security,” Georgian Economic Trends, No. 3, 2002; J. DeLay, “The Caspian Oil Pipeline Tangle: A Steel Web of Confusion,” in: Oil and Geopolitics of the Caspian Sea Region, ed. by M.P. Croissant, B. Aras, Praeger, Westport, 1999; J.H. Kalicki, “Caspian Energy at the Crossroads,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 80, No. 54, 2001; F. Müller, “Energy Development and Transport Network Coopera-tion in Central Asia and the South Caucasus,” in: Building Security in the New States of Eurasia. Subregional Coopera-tion in the Former Soviet Space, ed. by R. Dwan, O. Pavliuk, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, 2000; A. Rondeli, “The South Cau-casus: Pipeline Politics and Regional Economic Interests,” in: The South Caucasus: Promoting Values Through Coopera-tion, Seminar Report Series No. 20. Helsinki, 12-15 May, 2004, NATO Defense College, Academic Research Branch,Rome, 2004; S.F. Starr, S.E. Cornell, “The Politics of Pipelines: Bringing Caspian Energy to Markets,” SAISPHERE,2005; The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Oil Window to the West, ed. by S.F. Starr, S.E. Cornell, Uppsala University,Uppsala, 2005; Z. Tevzadze, “Caspian Oil: Its Export Routes and Transportation Problems,” Central Asia and the Cauca-sus, No. 1 (25), 2004.
See, for example: V. Maisaia, The Caucasus-Caspian Regional Security Agenda in the 21st Century: Caspian Oil Geopolitics and Georgia, Publishing House Global-Print, Tbilisi, 2002.
See, for example: S. Caglayan, H. Mamedov, R. Medzmariashvili, et al., Regional Review: Economic, Social and Environmental Overview of the ACG: BTC and Shah Deniz/SCP Projects in the National and Regional Context of Az-erbaijan, Georgia and Turkey, Minimax, Baku, 2003.
See: T. Ziyadov, “Officials Meet to Discuss South Caucasus Rail System,” Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 2, No. 232,14 December, 2005, available at [http://www.jamestown.org/edm/article.php?article_id=2370599].
See, for example: K.T. Derr, Commitment in the Caspian—A Chevron Perspective on Energy and Economic De-velopment, Chevron Corporation, Speech to the Asia Society, 20 October, 1998, available at [http://agitprop.org.au/stop-nato/19990524oil03.php].
See: S. Escudero, “Hub for the 21st Century. Azerbaijan’s Future Role in the Caspian Basin,” Azerbaijan Inter-national, No. 10.2, 2002.
Ibidem.
See: S. Escudero, “Visions of Baku. Future Hub of the Caspian,” Azerbaijan International, No. 9.3, 2001, availa-ble at [http://www.azer.com/aiweb/categories/magazine/93_folder/93_articles/93_stanley_escudero.html].
See: R. Boucher, “Opening of Caspian Basin Pipeline. United States Welcomes the Opening of Caspian Basin Pipeline,” International Information Programs, USINFO.STATE.GOV, Europe and Eurasia, 25 May, 2005, available at [http://usinfo.state.gov/eur/Archive/2005/May/25-468295.html].
See: L. Yevgrashina, “BP Starts Work on Baku-Ceyhan Oil Pipeline,” The Turkish Times, No. 308, 1 October,2002, available at [http://www.theturkishtimes.com/archive/02/10_01/f_ceyhan.html].
See: I. Ivakhnenko, “Southern Hospitality: Caspian Exporters Encourage Infrastructure Developments in Geor-gia,” Publications RE, 2005, available at [http://www.rusenergy.com/eng/export.htm].
See: G. Lomsadze, “Pipeline Puzzle,” AmCham News, American Chamber of Commerce on Georgia, Issue 6,December-January 2007-2008, available at [http://www.magazine.amcham.ge/issues/2007_6/06_2007_02.htm].
See: Z. Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives, Basic Books,New York, 1997, p. 41.
Ibidem.
Ibid., p. 40.
Ibid., pp. 46-47, 129.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
