THE CENTRAL CAUCASO-ASIAN COUNTRIES AND THE PROSPECTS OF ACCESSION TO THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION

Authors

  • Vladimer PAPAVA D.Sc. (Econ.), Full Member of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences,Professor at the Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University (Tbilisi, Georgia) Author

Abstract

This article considers the possible enlargement of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) through the accession of post-Soviet countries that form the geopolitical region of Central Caucaso-Asia. Three countries of that region—Armenia, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan—are already members of the EAEU. The possible accession of the other Central Caucaso-Asian countries—Azerbaijan, Georgia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan—remains an open question. In search of an answer, the author analyzes the main features of Central Caucaso-Asia as a region and examines the basic economic mechanism of EAEU integration, which is based on a redistribution of customs revenue from the export of Russia’s hydrocarbon resources in favor of the other Union countries. The sanctions against Russia imposed by the United States and other countries, as well as the counter-sanctions imposed by Moscow in response to them, significantly complicate the functioning of the EAEU as a regional economic association, thus considerably reducing its attractiveness to countries that can be regarded as potential members of this Union in the foreseeable future. At the same time, for Central Caucaso-Asian countries that have hydrocarbon resources of their own (Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan), the economic mechanism for redistributing customs revenue from Russian hydrocarbon exports at work in the EAEU may prove to be entirely insufficient to induce them to join the Union. The remaining countries of Central Caucaso-Asia (Georgia and Tajikistan) differ markedly in their attitude toward possible EAEU membership.

For Georgia, its European orientation is a matter of principle. Today, it is underpinned by the EU-Georgia Association Agreement (signed in 2014 and effective since 2016), which includes, as an integral part, an agreement establishing a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA). For Tajikistan, there are no fundamental obstacles to possible EAEU membership, although Western sanctions against Russia and Russian counter-sanctions, all other things being equal, may be seen by Dushanbe as something of a barrier to EAEU accession. At the same time, of all the Central Caucaso-Asian countries that are not members of the EAEU, Tajikistan is the most likely one to join the Union.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See, for example: Zh. Alpysbaeva, “Nursultan Nazarbayev: ot idei evraziiskogo soiuza k perspektivam evraziiskoi inte-gratsii,” zakon.kz, 30 May, 2014, available at [https://www.zakon.kz/4628189-nursultan-nazarbaev-ot-idei.html], 1 March, 2019.

See: L.M. Grigoriev, V.V. Brilliantova, V.A. Pavliushina, “Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soiuz: uspekhi i vyzovy inte-gratsii,” Mir novoi ekonomiki, No. 3, 2018, pp. 6-19.

See: N.E. Kotova, “Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soiuz: sovershenstvovanie normativno-pravovoi bazy,” Vestnik Fi-nansovogo universiteta, No. 5, 2016, pp. 126-132, available at [https://¿nancetp.fa.ru/jour/article/view/294/221], 1 March, 2019.

The geopolitical region of Central Caucaso-Asia (Central Caucasasia) includes the following countries: Armenia,Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan (see: V. Papava, “‘Central Caucasa-sia’ instead of ‘Central Eurasia’,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 2 (50), 2008, pp. 30-42).

See, for example: G. Kvinikadze, “Conceptualization of Geo-Economic Threats in Small Countries with Transition Economies,” Economic and Regional Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2017, pp. 42-52.

See: V. Papava, “Central Caucaso-Asia: Toward a Rede¿nition of Post-Soviet Central Eurasia,” Azerbaijan in the World, The Electronic Publication of Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy, Vol. I, No. 17, 1 October, 2008, available at [http://

iweekly.ada.edu.az/vol_1_no_17/Toward_a_rede¿nition_of_post-Soviet_Central_Eurasia.htm], 1 March, 2019.

Conceptual and terminological issues related to Central Asia are discussed in: S.M. Gorshenina, Izobretenie kont-septa Srednei/Centralnoi Azii. Mezhdu naukoi i geopolitikoi, Central Asia Studies Program, The George Washington Univer-sity, Washington, 2019, available at [http://centralasiaprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/svetlana-gorshenina.pdf],1 March, 2019.

See: E. Ismailov, V. Papava, Rethinking Central Eurasia, Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, Washington, D.C.; Insti-tute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm, 2010, pp. 8-20, available at [http://www.silkroadstudies.org/resources/

df/Monographs/2010_MONO_Ismailov-Papava_Rethinking-Central-Eurasia.pdf], 1 March, 2019.

See: L. Gumilev, Ritmy Evrazii: epokhi tsivilizatsii, АSТ, Moscow, 2007; A. Dugin, Osnovy geopolitiki. Geopolitiches-koe budushchee Rossii, Arktogeia, Moscow, 1997; idem, Evraziiskaia missiia Nursultana Nazarbayeva, Evraziia, St. Petersburg,2004; idem, Proekt “Evraziia”, Eksmo, Iauza, Moscow, 2004; N. Trubetskoi, Nasledie Chingiskhana, Eksmo, Moscow, 2007.

See: E. Ismailov, V. Papava, “A New Concept for the Caucasus,” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 8,No. 3, 2008, pp. 283-298.

See, for example: K.S. Gadzhiev, Geopolitika Kavkaza, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, Moscow, 2003; V. Cheterian,War and Peace in the Caucasus: Ethnic ConÀict and the New Geopolitics, Columbia University Press, New York, 2008;E. Herzig, The New Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, 1999;E. Ismailov, V. Papava, The Central Caucasus: Essays on Geopolitical Economy, CA&CC Press, Stockholm, 2006; E. Nuri-yev, The South Caucasus at the Crossroads: ConÀicts, Caspian Oil and Great Power Politics, LIT Verlag, Berlin, 2007.

See, for example: Crossroads and ConÀict: Security and Foreign Policy in the Caucasus and Central Asia, ed. by G.K. Bertsch, C. Craft, S.A. Jones, M. Beck, Routledge, New York, 2000; Faultlines of ConÀict in Central Asia and the South Caucasus: Implications for the U.S. Army, ed. by O. Oliker, T.S. Szayna, RAND, Santa Monica, 2003; The OSCE and the Multiple Challenges of Transition. The Caucasus and Central Asia, ed. by F. Sabahi, D. Warner, Ashgate, Aldershot, 2004.

See, for example: M.P. Amineh, H. Houweling, “Introduction: The Crisis in IR-Theory: Towards a Critical Geopo-litics Approach,” in: Central Eurasia in Global Politics: ConÀict, Security and Development, ed. by M.P. Amineh, H. Houwel-ing, Brill, Leiden, 2005, pp. 2-3; C. Fairbanks, C.R. Nelson, S.F. Starr, K. Weisbrode, Strategic Assessment of Central Eurasia,The Atlantic Council of the United States, Central Asia — Caucasus Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, D.C.,2001, p. vii; K. Meyer, The Dust of Empire: The Race for Supremacy in the Asian Heartland, Abacus, London, 2004,p. 206; G. Xuetang, “The Energy Security in Central Eurasia: The Geopolitical Implications to China’s Energy Strategy,”China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2006, p. 117.

See: V. Papava, “The Eurasianism of Russian Anti-Westernism and the Concept of ‘Central Caucaso-Asia’,” Russian Politics and Law, Vol. 51, No. 6, 2013, pp. 45-86.

See: V. Papava, “Central Caucaso-Asia: From Imperial to Democratic Geopolitics,” Bulletin of the Georgian Na-tional Academy of Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2010, pp. 183-187.

See: V. Papava, “Eurasia Versus Central Caucaso-Asia: On the Geopolitics of Central Caucaso-Asia,” CICERO Foundation Great Debate Paper, No. 09/8, December 2009, available at [http://www.cicerofoundation.org/lectures/Vladi-mer_Papava_On_the_Geopolitics_of_Central_Caucaso_Asia.pdf], 1 March, 2019.

See: K. Weisbrode, Central Eurasia: Prize or Quicksand? Contenting Views of Instability in Karabakh, Ferghana and Afghanistan, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, Adelphi Paper 338, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.

See: E. Ismailov, M. Esenov, “Central Eurasia in the New Geopolitical and Geo-Economic Dimensions,” in: Central Eurasia 2005 (Analytical Annual), CA&CC Press, Stockholm, 2005; N. Muzaffarli (Imanov), Reiting Azerbaidzhana v mezh-dunarodnykh sravnitelnykh issledovaniiakh, Kavkaz Publishers, Baku, 2006.

See, for example: K. Weisbrode, op. cit.

See: T.W. Simons, Jr., Eurasia’s New Frontiers: Young States, Old Societies, Open Futures, Cornell University Press,Ithaca, 2008, p. 47.

See, for example: I. Aliev, “Kaspiiskaia neft Azerbaidzhana,” Izvestia, Moscow, 2003; B.A. Gelb, “Caspian Oil and Gas: Production and Prospects,” Current Politics and Economics of the Caucasus Region, Vol. 1, No. 2/3, 2008; B.A. Gelb,T.R. Twyman, The Caspian Sea Region and Energy Resources, Novinka Books, New York, 2004.

See, for example: S.F. Starr, “The Investment Climate in Central Asia and the Caucasus,” in: Russian-Eurasian Re-naissance? U.S. Trade and Investment in Russia and Eurasia, ed. by J.H. Kalicki, E.K. Lawson, Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, D.C., 2003.

See, for example: Energy and Security: Toward a New Foreign Policy Strategy, ed. by J. Kalicki, D.L. Goldwyn,Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, D.C., 2005; F. Hill, Energy Empire: Oil, Gas and Russia’s Revival, The Foreign Policy Centre, London, 2004, available at [https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/20040930.pdf], 1 March,2019; E. Rakel, “Paradigms of Iranian Policy in Central Eurasia and Beyond,” in: Central Eurasia in Global Politics: ConÀict,Security and Development, ed. by M.P. Amineh, H. Houweling, Brill, Leiden, 2005.

See: A. Åslund, “Eventual Success of Market Reform,” in: Russian-Eurasian Renaissance? U.S. Trade and Invest-ment in Russia and Eurasia.

See: T.W. Simons, Jr., op. cit., p. 7.

See: A. Dugin, Proekt “Evraziia”.

See: M. Laruelle, “Eurasia, Eurasianism, Eurasian Union: Terminological Gaps and Overlaps,” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, No. 366, July 2015, available at [http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/¿les/policy-memos-pdf/Pepm366_

aruelle_July2015.pdf], 1 March, 2019; V. Papava, “Economic Models of Eurasianism and the Eurasian Union: Why the Future is Not Optimistic,” The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 29 October, 2015, available at [http://cacianalyst.org/publica-tions/analytical-articles/item/13296], 1 March, 2019.

See: A. Knobel, “Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soiuz: perspektivy razvitiia i vozmozhnye prepiatstviia,” Voprosy eko-nomiki, No. 3, 2015, pp. 87-108.

See: H. Appel, V. Gelman, “Revising Russia’s Economic Model: The Shift from Development to Geopolitics,” PO-NARS Eurasia Policy Memo, No. 397, November 2015, available at [http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/¿les/policy-memos-pdf/Pepm397_Appel-Gelman_Nov2015.pdf], 1 March, 2019.

See: V. Papava, “Economic Models of Eurasianism and the Eurasian Union: Why the Future is Not Optimistic.”

See, for example: S.E. Cornell, Small Nations and Great Powers. A Study of Ethnopolitical ConÀict in the Caucasus,Curzon Press, Surrey, 2001; S.E. Cornell, R.N. McDermott, W. O’Malley, V. Socor, S.F. Starr, Regional Security in the South Caucasus: The Role of NATO, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, SAIS, JHU, Washington, D.C., 2004.

See, for example: P. Diatlenko, “Struktura otnoshenii Kazakhstana i Kyrgyzstana v kontekste EAES,” Vneshniaia politika, 8 July, 2015, available at [http://foreignpolicy.ru/analyses/struktura-otnosheniy-kazahstana-i-kyrgyzstana-v-kontek-ste-eaes/], 1 March, 2019.

See, for example: V.V. Perskaia, “Mesto i rol Kyrgyzstana v razvitii Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza,” Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta, No. 6, 2016, pp. 133-139, available at [https://¿nancetp.fa.ru/jour/article/view/313/240], 1 March,2019.

Problems of ethnic relations in Kazakhstan are of considerable importance (see, for example: S. Isabaeva, “Mezhet-nicheskaia napriazhennost v Kazakhstane vse-taki sushchestvuet,” Central Asia Monitor, 2 November, 2015, available at [http://

amonitor.kz/19209-mezhetnicheskaya-napryazhennost-v-kazahstane-vse-taki-suschestvuet.html], 1 March, 2019; A. Shus-tov, “Otchuzhdennost rastet…,” Stoletie, 27 July, 2017, available at [http://www.stoletie.ru/zarubejie/otchuzhdennost_ras-tet_631.htm], 1 March, 2019.

See, for example: G. Godjaev, “Azerbaijan in EAEU: Is It Possible?” Eurasia Review, 18 February, 2018, available at [http://www.eurasiareview.com/18022018-azerbaijan-in-eaeu-is-it-possible-oped/], 1 March, 2019; L. Tariverdieva, “Azer-baidzhan v EAES: kogo pugaet takaia perspektiva?’ Day.Az, 12 October, 2017, available at [https://news.day.az/poli-tics/940642.html], 1 March, 2019.

See, for example: “Turkmeniia schitaet Rossiiu partnerom, no v EAES vstupat ne budet,” RIA Novosti, 14 July, 2014,available at [https://ria.ru/20140714/1015832476.html], 1 March, 2019; V. Tarasova, “Turkmenistan ne budet chlenom Evra-ziiskogo soiuza,” Masterforex, 14 July, 2014, available at [http://www.pro¿-forex.org/novosti-mira/novosti-sng/turkmenistan/

ntry1008218148.html], 1 March, 2019.

See, for example: A. Zhanuzakov, “Uzbekistan i EAES: vstuplenie iskliucheno, no torgovat mozhno,” 365 Info,10 August, 2017, available at [https://365info.kz/2017/08/uzbekistan-i-eaes-vstuplenie-isklyucheno-no-torgovat-mozhno-ekspert/], 1 March, 2019; P. Vorobyev, “Uzbekistan v blizhaishee vremia ne budet vstupat v Evraziiskii soiuz,” Evraziiskie issledovaniia, 12 February, 2018, available at [http://eurasian-studies.org/archives/7082], 1 March, 2019.

See, for example: A. Rondeli, “The Choice of Independent Georgia,” in: The Security of the Caspian Sea Region, ed.

y G. Chufrin, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.

See: V. Papava, “A Eurasian or a European Future for Post-Soviet Georgia’s Economic Development: Which is Bet-ter?” Archives of Business Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2017, pp. 159-170, available at [http://scholarpublishing.org/index.php/

BR/article/view/2651/1554], 1 March, 2019.

See, for example: “Soglashenie ob assotsiatsii Gruzii s ES o¿tsialno vstupilo v silu,” Sputnik, 1 июля 2016 [https://

putnik-georgia.ru/politics/20160701/232396228.html], 1 March, 2019.

See, for example: M. Kakulia, “Georgia’s Experiences on Developing Trade and Trade Policy Relations with the European Union,” East European Studies, No. 5, 2014, pp. 137-160, available at [http://vki.hu/¿les/download_772.html],1 March, 2019.

See: V. Pan¿lova, “Tadzhikistan sdelal pervyi shag k EAES,” Dialog tsivilizatsii, 16 December, 2018, available at [http://www.dialog.tj/news/tadzhikistan-sdelal-pervyj-shag-k-eaes], 1 March, 2019.

T.G. Rzaev, E.V. Alexandrova, “Vkhozhdenie Respubliki Tadzhikistan v EAES. Pravovoi analiz,” Gosudarstven-naia sluzhba i kadry, No. 2, 2018, pp. 150-152; Kh. Khurramov, “Tadzhikistan-EAES: ozhidaniia i opaseniia,” Evraziiskie issledovaniia, 30 March, 2018, available at [http://eurasian-studies.org/archives/7494], 1 March, 2019.

See, for example: V. Pan¿lova, “Tadzhikistan zovut v Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soiuz,” Vestnik Kavkaza, 23 April,2018, available at [http://vestikavkaza.ru/analytics/Tadzhikistan-zovut-v-Evraziyskiy-ekonomicheskiy-soyuz.html], 1 March,2019.

See, for example: “Ministr: Tadzhikistan vse eshche izuchaet pliusy i minusy ot vstupleniia v EAES,” Sputnik,10 August, 2018, available at [https://tj.sputniknews.ru/economy/20180810/1026413934/tajikistan-eaes-vstuplenie.html],1 March, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

Issue

Section

REGIONAL INTEGRATION

How to Cite

PAPAVA, V. (2019). THE CENTRAL CAUCASO-ASIAN COUNTRIES AND THE PROSPECTS OF ACCESSION TO THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 20(2), 16-23. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1438

Plaudit