ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE CENTRAL CAUCASO-ASIAN COUNTRIES ADJUSTED FOR THE CATCH-UP EFFECT

Authors

  • Vladimer PAPAVA D.Sc. (Econ.), Professor, enior Fellow of the Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies (Tbilisi, Georgia) Author

Abstract

One of the main problems of economic development is to ensure stable economic growth. This article examines some issues relating to the measurement of economic growth in the context of Central Caucaso-Asia, a geopolitical region which includes the countries of the Central Caucasus (Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia) and Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan).

It should be emphasized that this problem has been analyzed in a number of significant publications.2 In order to measure economic growth, it is particularly important to use a more or less adequate method allowing a spatial comparison of countries and regions. But at present such a comparison is complicated by the existence of the so-called “catch-up effect.”

 

 
 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: V. Papava, “Central Caucasasia Instead of Cen-tral Eurasia,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 2 (50),2008; V. Papava, “Central Caucaso-Asia: Toward a Redefi-nition of Post-Soviet Central Eurasia,” Azerbaijan in the World, The Electronic Publication of Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy, Vol. 1, No. 17, 1 October, 2008, available at [http://www.ada.edu.az/biweekly/issues/156/200903280419 27833.html], 7 September, 2012; V. Papava, “Eurasia Ver-sus Central Caucaso-Asia: On the Geopolitics of Central Caucaso-Asia,” CICERO Foundation Great Debate Paper No. 09/8, December 2009, available at [http://www.

icerofoundation.org/lectures/Vladimer_Papava_On_the_

eopolitics_of_Central_Caucaso_Asia.pdf], 7 September,2012; V. Papava, “Central Caucaso-Asia: From Imperial to Democratic Geopolitics,” Bulletin of the Georgian Nation-al Academy of Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2010.

See, for example: J.E. Stiglitz, A. Sen, J.-P. Fitous-si, Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up,The Report by the Commission of the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, The New Press,New York, 2010; R.J. Barro, X. Sala-i-Martin, Economic Growth, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004; M. leurbaey, “Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of So-cial Welfare,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 47,No. 4, 2009, pp. 1029-1075.

N.G. Mankiw, Principles of Economics, Thomson South-Western, Mason, 2004, pp. 546-547.

See: GDP Growth (Annual %), The World Bank, 2012, available at [http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/Y.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG], 7 September, 2012.

See: GDP Per Capita (Current U.S.$), The World Bank, 2012, available at [http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/Y.GDP.PCAP.CD], 7 September, 2012.

See: GDP Per Capita (Current U.S.$).

See: GDP Growth (Annual %).

See: GDP Per Capita (Current U.S.$).

See: GDP Growth (Annual %).

Downloads

Published

2012-08-31

Issue

Section

REGIONAL ECONOMIES

How to Cite

PAPAVA, V. (2012). ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE CENTRAL CAUCASO-ASIAN COUNTRIES ADJUSTED FOR THE CATCH-UP EFFECT. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 13(4), 120-128. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1556

Plaudit