GEOPOLITICAL LANDMARKS: CENTRAL ASIA TODAY

Authors

  • Murat LAUMULIN D.Sc. (Political Science), chief fellow at the Institute of Strategic Studies of Kazakhstan under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Author

Abstract

The year 2007 was a time of geopolitical changes for the region, some of which remained latent but completely analyzable. The geoeconomic factors and the worldwide financial crisis (a crisis of liquidity and defaults as well as instability in the international financial markets), the rising prices for basic commodities such as energy resources and foodstuffs, the economic growth in Russia, China, and India, and the rising importance of the energy security issue, etc. inevitably affected the situation in Central Asia.

The 2007-2008 crisis began in the mortgage system of the United States and spread like wildfire to the global banking and financial systems. It caused an economic decline in the United States and, by the end of 2007, reached the euro zone. Depreciation of the world’s main currency has hit the global economy; the value of dollar savings is steadily decreasing while export incomes converted into national currencies are losing their value. Transborder investment projects are at risk.

Strange as it may seem the states with currencies that could run the risk of gaining value have the largest dollar reserves. This fully applies to the tenge of Kazakhstan. Today, there is the danger of an uncontrollable and highly uncertain situation developing in the global economy that could continue for a long time to come. Countries and regions are exposed to considerable cumulative effects in the political or even military-political spheres. What is going on in the world today may hit the Kazakhstani economy either in the financial or the real sector: a financial shock spreads faster than a shock in the consumer sphere, which politicians should also take into account.

The United States is steadily losing control over its own national currency; it is no longer able to keep down inflation without raising the interest rate. The latter invites liquidity but interferes with  economic growth. Translated into terms of the global financial order, this means that the dollar is on the verge of losing its anchor currency status. This may happen much earlier than expected. The rest of the world will be hit: the universal currency served all and helped maintain international stability. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Feigenbaum, The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Future of Central Asia, The Nixon Center,

Washington, D.C., 6 September, 2007

For more detail, see: A. Cohen, “After the G-8 Summit: China and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization,” The

China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 3, February 2006, pp. 51-64.

For more detail, see: The EU and Central Asia: Strategy for a New Partnership, PRC, Brussels, 2007, 20 pp.

For more detail, see: A.J.K. Bailes, “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Europe,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2007, pp. 13-18.

For more detail, see: A. Warkotsch, Die Zentralasiatische Politik der Europäischen Union: Interessen, Strukturen

und Reformoptionen, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M., 2006, 253 pp.

For more detail, see: The New Silk Roads: Transport and Trade in Greater Central Asia, ed. by S.F. Starr, Central

Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies, Washington, D.C., 2007, 510 pp.

For more detail, see: M. Laruelle, Russia’s Central Asia Policy and the Role of Russian Nationalism, A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center, Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, Washington, D.C., 2008, 79 pp.

For more detail, see: S. Peyrouse, The Economic Aspects of the Chinese-Central Asia Rapprochement, Central AsiaCaucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies, Washington, D.C., 2008, 73 pp.

For more detail, see: R. Weitz, Kazakhstan and the New International Politics of Eurasia, Central Asia-Caucasus

Institute & Silk Road Studies, Washington, D.C., 2008, 189 pp.

For more detail, see: Machtmosaik Zentralasien. Traditionen, Restriktionen, Aspirationen, M. Sapper, V. Weichsel, A. Huterer (Hrsg.), BPB, Bonn, 2007, 648 pp.

Downloads

Published

2008-10-31

Issue

Section

GEOGRAPHY, GEOPOLITICS, AND THE RELATED TERMS

How to Cite

LAUMULIN, M. (2008). GEOPOLITICAL LANDMARKS: CENTRAL ASIA TODAY. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 9(5), 16-28. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1207

Plaudit