CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR THE INTEGRATION PROCESSES IN THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS: EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN DIMENSIONS

Authors

  • Ashot ALEXANIAN Ph.D. (Political Science), Assistant Professor at the Chair of Theory and istory of Political Science, Department of International Relations, Erevan State University (Erevan, Armenia) Author

Keywords:

European integration, Eurasian reintegration, Southern Caucasus, civiliarchy, political stability, government effectiveness, integration barriers, integration potential, effective integration relations, integration complementarity, regional civil society, level of social responsibility, social partnership.

Abstract

The existing political, socioeconomic, and spiritual-cultural contradictions and conflicts in the Southern Caucasus can only be overcome by means of efficient European integration and Eurasian reintegration of the countries that belong to this region. The South Caucasian countries have been carrying out reforms in all spheres of social life within the framework of European integration. These reforms were aimed at ensuring sustainable development and chiliarches harmonization based on the European social model and, therefore, promoted internal and international integration. This has created prerequisites for establishing democratic institutions and rapidly forming a civil society; it has also raised government and local self-administration effectiveness, as well as the level of public capital, legal culture, and social security of the population. The obligations in the South Caucasian countries have taken upon themselves within the framework of international (including European) organizations has helped to overcome political instability, ethnic conflicts, social differentiation, and other destructive processes. The emergence of new dividing lines indicating the huge differences between the highly incompatible European and Eurasian integration projects threatens to destabilize the Southern Caucasus.

It is also important to keep in mind that the Eurasian reintegration project, which embodies a modern development concept, is still coming to fruition. It has yet to undergo the social verification and instrumentalization so necessary in the current reality of the “knowledge society.” 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S.M. Markedonov, “Postsovetsky Iuzhny Kavkaz: traditsionalizm plius modernizatsiia,” Prognozis, No. 1 (9), 2007,pp. 332-348, available at [http://intelros.ru/pdf/Prognozis/01/Markedonov.pdf].

See: A.S. Alexanian, “The Civiliarchic Foundations of Political Democratization in Armenia,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 12, Issue 3, 2011, pp. 116-127; idem, “Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: tsivilitsentrizm i tsivilitet,” in: Politiches-kaia nauka i politicheskie protsessy v RF i Novykh Nezavisimykh Gosudarstvakh, URO RAS, Ekaterinburg, 2006, pp. 5-11.

See: “Partnership and Cooperation Agreements (PCAs): Russia, Eastern Europe, the Southern Caucasus and Central Asia,” available at [http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/external_relations/relations_with_third_countries/ eastern_europe_

nd_central_asia/r17002_en.htm].

See: Joint Declaration of the European Union and the Republics of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, 22 June, 1999,Luxembourg, available at [http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_PRES-99-202_en.htm?locale=en].

See: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament “Wider Europe—Neighbour-hood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours,” COM (2003) 104 final, Brussels, 11 March,2003, available at [http://eeas.europa.eu/enp/pdf/pdf/com03_104_en.pdf].

See: “EU-Armenia Relations,” available at [http://eeas.europa.eu/armenia/index_en.htm]; “EU-Azerbaijan Relations,”available at [http://eeas.europa.eu/azerbaijan/index_en.htm]; “EU-Georgia Relations,” available at [http://eeas.europa.eu/geor-gia/index_en.htm].

See: Civil Society Forum of Eastern Partnership (CSF EP), available at [http://www.eap-csf.eu/ru/home]; The Arme-nian National Platform of CSF EP, available at [http://www.eap-csf.eu/ru/countries/armenia]; The Azerbaijani National Plat-form of CSF EP, available at [http://civilsocietyforum.az/en]; The Georgian National Platform of CSF EP, available at [http://

apnationalplatform.ge].

See: Path of Initiative—Support Program of Civil Society Development in the Southern Caucasus, 2014-2015 (Czech noncommercial organization NESEHNUTÍ), available in Russian at [http://ru.cestainiciativy.cz].

See: “South Caucasian Network for Civil Consent (2001-2003)”; “Armenia-Azerbaijan-Turkey: Journalist Initia-tive-2002”; “Armenia-Azerbaijani/Azerbaijani-Armenian Information Center (2002-2003)”; “Quality Coverage in the Media of Events in the South Caucasian Countries as a Way to Overcome Regional Problems (2006)”; “Journalist Support of Stabil-ity and Cooperation in the Caucasus (2010)”; “Assessment of the Partiality of Online Media when Covering Armenian-Azerbaijani Relations (2010-2011)”; “Development of the Dialog between Armenia and Turkey (2010-2011)”; “Assistance to the Settlement of Armenian-Turkish Relations (2010-2012)”; “Monitoring Media Freedom in the Eastern Region of the Euro-pean Neighborhood Policy (2013-2015)”, in: Erevan Press Club, in Russian at [http://www.ypc.am/projects/ln/ru].

See: Human Rights House Network, available at [http://humanrightshouse.org].

D. Losaberidze, “Mestnoe samoupravlenie v Gruzii,” in: D. Tumanian, D. Losaberidze, M. Giulaliev, Mestnnoe sa-moupravlenie na Iuzhnom Kavkaze: munitsipalnye finansy i uslugi, vzaimootnosheniia mezhdu organami tsentralnogo uprav-leniia i mestnogo samoupravleniia, Erevan, 2009, p. 75, available at [http://cfoa.am/Gorchunejutjun/Hratarakcutjunner/

SG%20in%20South%20Caucasus_2009.pdf].

See: Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit, 7 May, 2009, Prague, available at [http://www.

onsilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/er/10758.pdf].

See: Eastern Neighborhood: Communication of the European Commission to the European Parliament and European Council, COM (2008) 823 final, Brussels, 3 December, 2008, available at [http://eeas.europa.eu/eastern/docs/com08_823_ru.pdf].

See: Civil Society Forum of Eastern Partnership.

See: Novaia Bolshaia Strana. Evraziisky soiuz—edinaia tsivilizatsiia, mnogo gosudarstv, Proektno-analitichesky doklad, Rukovoditel razrabotki—Iu.V. Krupnov, Dushanbe, Moscow, 2012.

“Signing the Political Part of the Association Agreement with the EU is the Best Route for Armenia: Prime Minister,”21 March, 2014, available in Russian at [http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1781457.html].

“Azerbaijan Refuses Association with the European Union,” 25 November, 2013, available in Russian at [http://www.

m.ru/world/2013/11/25/ evropeiskii-soyuz-es/726011-azerbaidzhan-otkazalsya-ot-assotsiatsii-s-evrosoyuzom].

V.V. Putin, “Novy integratsionnyy proekt dlia Evrazii—budushchee, kotoroe rozhdaetsia segodnia,” 3 October, 2011,Izvestia, available at [http://izvestia.ru/news/502761].

[http://www.cis.minsk.by/page.php?id=176].

“Three states joined the CIS and invited the new states of the former Soviet Union to join the Commonwealth. Why,of the 15 Union republics, was it these three that assumed the right to cancel the 1922 Treaty? They were the only remaining legal founders by that time and, consequently, successors of the former treaty (the fourth party to the agreement, the Zakavka-zskaia S.F.S.R. had long ceased to exist). This is what served as the legal ground the initiators of the Belovezh Agreement decided to take advantage of” (“Collapse of the Soviet Union and Formation of the Commonwealth of Independent States,”available at [http://www.protown.ru/information/hide/3710.html]).

[http://www.cismission.mid.ru/ii1_4.html].

“Putin: The CIS was Created for the Purpose of a ‘Divorce,’” 25 March, 2005, available in Russian at [http://news.

bc.co.uk/hi/russian/russia/newsid_4382000/4382389.stm].

See: “Nursultan Nazarbaev Believes that Armenia Should Join the EEU without Nagorno-Karabakh,” 2 June, 2014,available in Russian at [http://eurasianews.md/eurasia/nursultan-nazarbaev-schitaet-chto-armeniya-dolzhna-vstupat-eaes-bez-nagornogo-karabaha.htm].

See: “Action Plan Aimed at Implementing the Program of Measures (Road Map) with the Aim of Membership in the Customs Union and Common Economic Space of the Republic of Belarus, Republic of Kazakhstan, and the Russian Federa-tion,” available in Russian at [https://www.e-gov.am/u_files/file/decrees/kar/2014/01/ Mar1maqsayin.pdf].

See: “Armenia Performs Essentially All Points of the Road Map for Joining the Customs Union—Nalbandian,” 22 April,2014, available at [http://novostink.ru/armenia/67354-armeniya-vypolnila-prakticheski-vse-punkty-dorozhnoy-karty-po-vstu-pleniyu-v-tamozhennyy-soyuz-nalbandyan.html].

Downloads

Published

2014-06-30

Issue

Section

REGIONAL INTEGRATION

How to Cite

ALEXANIAN, A. (2014). CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR THE INTEGRATION PROCESSES IN THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS: EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN DIMENSIONS. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 15(3), 28-40. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1658

Plaudit

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1264

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.