MID-TERM STIMULI, BASIC PRINCIPLES, AND READJUSTMENTS: AMERICA IN CENTRAL ASIA
Keywords:
The U.S., Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Iran, Afghanistan, foreign policy, international relations, synergyAbstract
The United States is kept busy by the events unfolding worldwide and on the Eurasian continent (the Ukrainian crisis, Afghanistan, the anti-Russian sanctions, oil and gas prices, the Muhammad cartoons crisis, the Lausanne talks on the Iranian nuclear file, etc.). Under the pressure of these and many other factors, Washington is actively readjusting its Central Asian policy, as well as its conceptual approaches to the regional policies of other players and to the changing specifics of each of the Central Asian countries.
Its claims to regional leadership are challenged by the Color Revolutions and its ambiguous involvement in the Middle East. Hence the tectonic shifts in the minds of the Central Asian elites, the dampened Pro Western enthusiasm, and the noticeable changes in public opinion in the Central Asian republics.
The author has discussed America’s foreign policy and its implementation in the region based on the values the United States declares to be fundamental, the specifics of the “progress of democracy,” and the new real and potential regional security risks. Possible steps by other players involved in the region—China, Russia, Turkey, and Iran—and America’s possible response to potential developments are also discussed. The author looks at the relations between the U.S. and each of the Central
Asian republics. When analyzing the relationship between Washington and Astana, Tashkent, Ashghabad, Dushanbe, and Bishkek, he concentrates on synergetic methods, which presuppose the quest for and use of active constructive impacts on unstable situations.
Downloads
References
For more details, see: R. Abdullo, “Central Asian Countries and the United States: Ups and Downs in Their Relation-ships,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 6 (36), 2005, pp. 43-50; M. Bratersky, A. Suzdaltsev, “Central Asia: A Region of Economic Rivalry among Russia, China, the U.S., and the EU,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 3 (57), 2009, pp. 78-88;A. Saidmuradov, E. Puseva, “The Greater Central Asia Concept in U.S. Foreign Policy in the Central Asian Region,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Volume 11, Issue 3, 2010, pp. 102-108; M. Laumulin, “U.S. Central Asian Policy Under President Barack Obama,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Volume 11, Issue 4, 2010, pp. 41-54; V. Karyakin, “U.S. Middle Eastern Policy: New Approaches and Old Problems ,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Volume 11, Issue 4, 2010, pp. 79-87; G. Yul-dasheva, “U.S. Strategy in Central Asia: Problems and Achievements,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Volume 12, Issue 2,2011, pp. 141-151; V. Laumulin, “U.S. Strategy and Policy in Central Asia,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 4 (46), 2007,pp. 46-56.
For more details, see: J. Shaw, Washington Diplomacy: Profiles of People of World Influence, Algora Publishers, New York, 2002, p. 238.
“Talbott Details U.S. Approach to Caucasus, Central Asia (Administration seeks more funds for region),” 21 July,1997, The Embassy of the United States of America to Israel, available at [http://www.usembassy-israel.org.il/publish/press/
tate/archive/1997/july/sd20722.htm].
“The United States and Central Asia: An Enduring Vision for Partnership and Connectivity in the 21st Century, “31 March,2015, Brookings Institution [www.brookings.edu].
See: J. Mankoff, The United States and Central Asia after 2014. А Report of the CSIS Russia and Eurasia Program.
anuary 2013, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C., 2013.
See: I. Talley, “U.S. Looks to Work with China-Led Infrastructure Fund,” The Wall Street Journal, 22 March, 2015.
A. Nathan, “The Chinese Question in Central Asia: Domestic Order, Social Change, and the Chinese Factor,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 92, No. 6, 2014.
R. Blackwill, A. Tellis, Revising U.S. Grand Strategy Toward China, Council on Foreign Relations Special Report.
o. 72, March 2015, Washington, New York, 2015; R.D. Blackwill, A.J. Tellis, “A New U.S. Grand Strategy towards China,”13 April, 2015, available at [www.nationalinterest.org].
A. Scobell, F. Ratner, M. Beckley, China’s Strategy Toward South and Central Asia. An Empty Fortress, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif, 2014, p. 79.
National Security Strategy, February 2015 [www.whitehouse.gov].
“State’s Blinken on a Vision for Central Asia. Remarks by Antony J. Blinken, Deputy Secretary of State,” Brookings Institute, Washington, D.C., 31 March, 2015, U.S. Department of State, available at [www.state.gov].
“The New Silk Road Post-2014: Challenges and Opportunities,” Assistant Secretary Nisha Desai Biswal, Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs; The Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of State, available at [www.state.gov].
“Central Asia: What’s Next?” Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Richard E. Hoagland, Bureau of South and Cen-tral Asian Affairs; Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., 30 March, 2015, U.S. Department of State, available at [www.
tate.gov].
See: “Signing of a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty between the United States and Kazakhstan,” Washington, D.C.,20 February, 2015, U.S. Department of State [www.state.gov].
See: R. Legvold, “State Erosion: Unlootable Resources and Unruly Elites in Central Asia,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 93,No. 2, 2014.
See: K. Johnson, “Central Asia’s Cheap Oil Double Whammy”, Foreign Policy, 3 March, 2015.
See: J. Mankoff, Op. cit.
See: “Joint Statement on the Third U.S.-Kyrgyz Republic Annual Bilateral Consultations,” Washington, D.C., 17 April,
// U.S. Department of State, available at [www.state.gov].
“The New Silk Road Post-2014…”
S. Swerdlow, A. Stroehlein, “Uzbekistan and the American Myth of ‘Strategic Patience’,” 28 January, 2015, available at [www.eurasianet.org].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
