INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS IN DAGESTAN: THE ROLE OF PERCEIVED SECURITY, INTERCULTURAL CONTACTS, AND MUTUAL ACCULTURATION
Keywords:
intercultural relations, perceived security, intercultural contacts, intercultural preference, attitudes, integration, separation, DagestanAbstract
Dagestan is the most multiethnic and multilingual republic within the Russian Federation. From the viewpoint of interethnic relations, Dagestan is a unique research platform: the model of ethnopsychological compatibility of numerous peoples has been implemented here for centuries. It is essential for researchers to under- stand which factors contribute to and which hinder the establishment of effective interethnic communication in modern Dagestan. This empirical study was conducted in the context of the acculturation theory introduced by the Canadian cross-cultural psychologist John Berry. This article presents the results of researching the impact of perceived security, friendly intercultural contacts, preference for supporting a multicultural ideology, ethnic tolerance, and mutual integration attitude on the psychological well-being of both individual ethnic groups and Dagestani population as a whole.
In the course of the study, the authors suggested that the higher the perceived security among ethnic groups in Dagestan, the greater the tendency towards maintaining a multicultural ideology, tolerance, and the preference for an integration strategy, and the lower the preference for a separation strategy (multiculturalism hypothesis). In addition, the authors hypothesized that the higher the intensity of friendly intercultural contacts between representatives of various ethnic groups in Dagestan, the higher their level of tolerance, preference for an integration strategy and the lower their preference for a separation strategy (contact hypothesis). The authors also suggested that the higher the preference for the integration strategy by representatives of various Dagestani ethnic groups, the higher their self esteem and life satisfaction (integration hypothesis). The sample included Avars, Dargins, Russians and representatives of other ethnic groups: Kumyks, Lezgins, Laks, Tabasarans, Nogais, etc. (total number of respondents N = 438).
The data were analyzed both for the total sample and for a sample of specific ethnic groups using a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. MIRIPS questionnaire scales were used. The results demonstrated the contribution of perceived security to a preference for a multicultural ideology, tolerance, and mutual integration in the total sample. The results also demonstrated that the intensity of friendly intercultural contacts has no significant effect on tolerance or mutual integration in Dagestan. However, the preference for mutual integration contributes to life satisfaction and self-esteem among the in- habitants of Dagestan, which confirms the integration hypothesis. A separation prefer- ence was positively associated with perceived security, life satisfaction and negatively with friendly intercultural contacts among repre- sentatives of certain ethnic groups of Dages- tan. The results obtained demonstrate the importance of solving the problem of per- ceived security for building effective intercul- tural relations in Dagestan. The formation of a national policy in matters of preserving the cultural identity of various ethnic groups must be adequate, since, as the study has shown, separation strategy only leads to life satisfaction, and integration strategy is associated with both life satisfaction and self-esteem of the inhabitants of Dagestan.
Downloads
References
See: All-Russia Population Census 2010, Statistical Collection / Rosstat, ISC “Statistics of Russia,” Moscow, 2011, 87 pp., available in Russian at [http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/demo/perepis2010/VPN_BR.pdf], 10 March, 2018.
See: “Skolko korennykh narodov prozhivaet v respublike Dagestan?” 2017, available at [http://www.internet-jurnal-russia-online.com/natsionalnyj-vopros-/narody rossii-/narody-dagestana-/], 10 March, 2018.
See: The Constitution of the Republic of Dagestan [http://docs.cntd.ru/document/802018919], 12 November, 2018.
See: Z.M. Abdulagatov, Osobennosti sotsializatsii sovremennoy molodezhi i sotsialnye deformatsii v molodezhnoy srede (na primere Respubliki Dagestan), IIAE, Makhachkala, 2011, 206 pp.; Z.B. Arslanbekova, “Religioznaia identichnost dagestantsev: traditsionalizm i vakhkhabizm,” 2012, available at [http://www.gumilev-center.az/religioznaya-identichnost- dagestancev/], 11 March, 2018; Demograficheskie i etnicheskie problemy Severnogo Kavkaza i puti ikh reshenia, Foundation for Advanced Research “Bastion,” Moscow, 2012, 130 pp.; A. Buttaeva, “Islam in Polyconfessional Dagestan,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 2012, available at [https://www.ca-c.org/journal/2012-01-eng/05.shtml], 3 June, 2020.
See: A.G. Agaev, R.M. Magomedov, Dagestanskoe edinstvo, istoria i sovremennost, Daguchpedgiz, Makhachkala, 1995. 94 pp.
See: A.A. Yarlykapov, “Sovremenny Dagestan: aktualnye etnopoliticheskie i etnokonfessionalnye problemy,” Sotsio-dinamika, No. 3, 2012, pp. 130-153, available at [http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_257.html], 8 August, 2017 [DOI: 10.7256/2306-
2012.3.257].
See: Z.B. Arslanbekova, op. cit.; Z.S. Arukhov, Religia i identichnost v Rossii: poiski etnicheskoy i religioznoy identichnosti v Dagestane, Vostochnaia literatura, Moscow, 2003, pp. 177-191; S.I. Murtuzaliev, “Politika Rossii v Dagestane i na Severnom Kavkaze na rubezhe XX i XXI stoletiy glazami mestnykh zhiteley,” in: Severny Kavkaz v natsionalnoy strategii Rossii, Rosinformagrotekh, Moscow, 2008, pp. 116-128.
See: R.I. Abakarov, “Mezhetnicheskie otnoshenia v Respublike Dagestan (po materialam sotsiologicheskikh issledo- vaniy 2013 g.),” Bulletin of the Dagestan Scientific Center, No. 51, 2013, pp. 135-138; M.M. Shakhbanova, “Mezhnatsional- nye otnoshenia v Respublike Dagestan: sostoianie i tendentsii,” Bulletin of the Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnogra- phy, No. 3, 2017, pp. 152-163.
See: The Constitution of the Republic of Dagestan of 26 July, 1994, available in Russian at [http://docs.cntd.ru/document/748300070], 15 March, 2017.
N. Gadzhiakhmedov, “Mnogoiazychny Dagestan: problemy bez perspektiv,” Dagestanskaia pravda, 17 July, 2002; A. Mekhtikhanov, “Luchshe gor mogut byt tolko gortsy,” Molodezh Dagestana, No. 26, 2002, p. 28.
See: N. Gadzhiakhmedov, op. cit.
See: Demograficheskie i etnicheskie problemy Severnogo Kavkaza i puti ikh reshenia.
See: M.M. Shakhbanova, Yu.M. Lysenko, R.M. Mamaraev, “Dagestanskie russkie o sostoianii mezhnatsionalnoy situatsii v Respublike Dagestan,” Bulletin of the Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography, No. 2, 2015, pp. 149-157.
See: Mutual Intercultural Relations, ed. by J.W. Berry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017.
See: J. Kruusvall, R. Vetik, J.W. Berry, “The Strategies of Inter-Ethnic Adaptation of Estonian Russians,” Studies of Transition States and Societies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 3-24.
See: N.M. Lebedeva, A.N. Tatarko, J.W. Berry, “Sotsialno-psikhologicheskie osnovy multikulturalizma: prover-ka gipotez o mezhkulturnom vzaimodeystvii v rossiyskom kontekste,” Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2016, pp. 92-104.
See: G.W. Allport, The Nature of Prejudice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1954; T.F. Pettigrew, “Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 23, 1997, pp. 173-185.
See: B.P.H. Hui, S.X. Chen, C.M. Leung, J.W. Berry, “Facilitating Adaptation and Intercultural Contact: The Role of Integration and Multicultural Ideology in Dominant and Nondominant Group,” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 45, 2015, pp. 70-84, available at [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.01.002]; T.F. Pettigrew, L.R. Tropp, When Groups Meet. The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact, Psychology Press, New York, 2011.
See: S.C. Bagci, A. Rutland, M. Kumashiro, P.K. Smith, H. Blumberg, “Are Minority Status Children’s Cross-Ethnic Friendships Beneficial in a Multiethnic Context?” British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 32, 2014, pp. 107-115, available at [DOI: 10.1111/bjdp.12028].
See: A.-M. D. Nguyen, V. Benet-Martinez, “Biculturalism and Adjustment: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, Vol. 44, 2013, pp. 122-159.
See: I. Jasinskaja-Lahti, G. Horenczyk, T. Kinunen, “Time and Context in the Relationship Between Acculturation Attitudes and Adaptation among Russian-Speaking Immigrants in Finland and Israel,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 37, No. 9, 2011, pp. 1423-1440; L. Kus-Harbord, C. Ward, “Ethnic Russians in Post-Soviet Estonia: Perceived Devaluation, Acculturation, Well-Being, and Ethnic Attitudes,” International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2015, pp. 66-81.
See: Mutual Intercultural Relations, ed. by J.W. Berry.
For more details, see: N.M. Lebedeva, A.N. Tatarko, Strategii mezhkulturnogo vzaimodeystvia migrantov i prinimaiushchego naselenia Rossii, RUDN, Moscow, 2009.
See: M. Rosenberg, Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1965.
See: E. Diener, R.A. Emmons, R.J. Larson, S. Griffin, “The Satisfaction with Life Scale,” Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1985, pp. 71-75.
See: J.L. Arbuckle, “IBM SPSS Amos 19 User’s Guide,” Amos Development Corporation, Crawfordville, FL, 2010.
See: Mutual Intercultural Relations, ed. by J.W. Berry.
See: N. Lebedeva, A. Tatarko, V.N. Galyapina, “Intercultural Relations in Latvia and Azerbaijan,” in: Mutual Inter- cultural Relations, Ch. 3, pp. 59-80, available at [Doi.org/10.1017/9781316875032].
See: A. Sidorenko, “Politicheskaia vlast v etnicheskikh regionakh,” in: Federalizm i etnicheskoe raznoobrazie v Ros- sii, Collection of articles, ed. by I. Busygina, A. Heinemann-Grüder, Rossiyskaia politicheskaia entsiklopedia, Moscow, 2010, pp. 94-111.
See: All-Russia Population Census 2010, Statistical Collection / Rosstat.
Ibidem.
See: N. Gadzhiakhmedov, op. cit.; A. Mekhtikhanov, op. cit.
See: A. Voci, M. Hewstone, “Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Toward Immigrants in Italy: The Mediational Role of Anxiety and the Moderational Role of Salience,” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2003.pp. 37-54.
See: G.W. Allport, op. cit.
See: N. Gadzhiakhmedov, op. cit.; A. Mekhtikhanov, op. cit.
See: All-Russia Population Census 2010, Statistical Collection / Rosstat.
See: “Etnicheskaia demografia russkikh Dagestana,” 2011, available at [http://evrazia.org/article/1788], 11 March,2017.
See: N. Lebedeva, A. Tatarko, V.N. Galyapina, op. cit.
See: J.W. Berry, V.N. Galyapina, N.M. Lebedeva, Z.Kh. Lepshokova, T.A. Ryabichenko, “Intercultural Relations in Georgia and Tajikistan: A Post-Conflict Model,” Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2019, pp. 232-249, available at [DOI: 10.17323/1813-8918-2019-2-232-249].
See: I. Jasinskaja-Lahti, G. Horenczyk, T. Kinunen, op. cit.
See: Mutual Intercultural Relations, ed. by J.W. Berry; J.S. Phinney, G. Horenczyk, K. Liebkind, P. Vedder, “Ethnic Identity, Immigration, and Well-Being: An Interactional Perspective,” Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 57, 2001, pp. 493-510.
See: L. Kus-Harbord, C. Ward, op. cit.
See: V. Esses, J.F. Dovidio, G. Hodson, “Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in the United States and Canada in Response to September 11, 2001 ‘Attack on America’,” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 2, 2002, pp. 69-85.
See: T.F. Pettigrew, op. cit.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
