THE IDENTITY OF KAZAKHSTANI YOUTH: IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION AND NEOTRADITIONALISM
Keywords:
Kazakhstani youth, identity, values, ethnicity, religiosity, patriotism, educationAbstract
The article analyzes the value orientations of modern student youth in Kazakhstan that influence the formation of their identity. Based on the analysis of this social group’s value alignments, the article attempts to determine the vital problem areas in the formation of the character of young people as those capable of taking responsibility for their own destiny and the destiny of their country. Special attention is heeded to ethnic, religious and civic identities. The ratio of civil and ethnic identities among Kazakhstani student youth is assessed. A growth tendency in the norms of individualism and indifference to traditional forms of identity is revealed. Particular attention is paid to the influence of traditional and modernization values on the self-awareness of Kazakhstani youth. This research perspective was selected deliberately. The current state of public relations—both global, and Kazakhstani in particular—is determined by active ambiguous, multi-directional transformation processes. Under these circumstances, the issue of identity becomes especially acute for young people, and a search for sources of worldviews ensues to help young people formulate and self-actualize their own essence and to construct their own view of the world. In the course of this search, it is crucial to avoid becoming an object of various kinds of ideological, spiritual, ideological manipulation and recruiting. The modern contemporary social reality engenders a wide variety of spiritual practices, ideological revelations and political modules. It is essential for a young person to make the right choice based on objective knowledge and understanding. Under the circumstances, a special responsibility is imposed on the education system. Unfortunately, the modern higher education system in Kazakhstan pays special attention to the rigid specialization of graduates as part of the current vigorous reforms. Purely professional training is becoming a priority, while the issues of socio-humanitarian, ideological training of our future specialists remain on the margins of the educational system, which, in turn, impedes their successful socialization. It is in these epistemological coordinates that this article was prepared. The article is based on the data obtained through a sociological study conducted in 2019 as part of the project “Formation of the Concept of Religious Tolerance and Ethnic Consolidation in Educational Formats of Modern Kazakhstan.”
Downloads
References
See: “Studencheskaia molodezh: sotsialnyy portret,” Astana, 2014, available at [https://eljastary.kz/articles/63/0], 20 July, 2019.
See: Report on the Research Work “Kazakhstani Youth as a Strategic Resource of the Society of Universal Labor” (interim)—The Youth Scientific-Research Center, Astana, 2016 (in Russian).
See: B.G. Nurzhanov, “Globalizatsia: zakat natsionnosti ili rastsvet etnichnosti?” in: Ustoychivost etnokulturnykh sistem v kontekste dinamiki globalizatsii. Materialy gorodskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Almaty, 2012, pp. 79-88.
See: B.I. Karipbayev, Transformations of National Consciousness in the Modernization Context of Modern Kazakhstan,Print shop, Karaganda, 2019.2011.
See: O.A. Simonova, “K formirovaniiu sotsiologii identichnosti,” Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, No. 3, 2008, pp. 45—61.
See: Yu.V. Popkov, S.A. Madyukova, “Fenomen sotsiokulturnogo neotraditsionalizma,” Aleteiia, St. Petersburg,
See: V.A. Lapshin, “Formy neotraditsionalizma: Severo-Zapadnyy federalnyy okrug,” Nauchno-issledovatelskaia baza dannykh “Rossiyskiye modeli arkhaizatsii i neotraditsionalizatsii,” 2014, available at [http://neoregion.ru/szfo.html?PH PSESSID=1ce91e1b3a57218d3c4ab30aa05a582e], 14 December, 2018.
See: A. Giddens, Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives, Profile, London, 1999.
See: Ye.G. Vialova, “Identichnost molodezhi v kontekste sovremennykh filosofskikh issledovaniy,” Bulletin of Kalmyk University, No. 2 (30), 2016, p. 130.
See: G. Mead, Mind, Self, and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1934; P. Berger, T. Lukmann, The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge, Penguin Books, London, 1966; A. Giddens, The Constitution of Society, Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984; A. Touraine, Le retour de l’acteur. Essai de sociologie, Librairie Arthème Fayard, Paris, 1984, 350 pp.
See: O.A. Simonova, op. cit.
See: E. Erikson, Childhood and Society, 2nd Edition, Norton, New York, 1963.
See: E. Erikson, Identity, Youth and Crisis, Norton, New York, 1968.
See: E. Erikson, Childhood and Society.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.