FEMALE RELIGIOSITY IN POST-SECULAR SOCIETY: ISLAM IN KAZAKHSTAN

Authors

  • Ainura BOLYSBAYEVA Ph.D. Student, Department of Religious and Cultural Studies, al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Author
  • Aigerim BOLYSBAYEVA Master of Social Sciences, Lecturer, Department of Sociology and Social Work, al-Farabi Kazakh National University (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Author
  • Kairat ZATOV D.Sc. (Philos.), Professor, Department of Religious Studies, Nur-Mubarak Egyptian University of Islamic Culture (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Author
  • Nurgul TUTINOVA Ph.D. (Religious Studies), Senior Lecturer, Department of Social Work and Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan, Karaganda University of Kazpotrebsoyuz (Karaganda, Kazakhstan) Author

Keywords:

female religiosity, religious identity, confessional (self)identity, religious socialization, religious practices, religious consciousness

Abstract

Today, religious renaissance across the post-Soviet space has moved into the center of academic attention mainly because post-Soviet countries have found themselves at the crest of religious awareness in the form of revived traditional religions. In Kazakhstan, this process has taken the form of Islamic revival, the religion of the autochthonous population, which lived in the territory of the contemporary state.
According to many authors, the family is the main religious socialization institution: mothers as its main agents play the key role in raising the younger generation. This means that female religiosity requires close attention and detailed studies.

With this aim in view, we carried out an online opinion poll among women 18 years and older in all regions of Kazakhstan to identify the interconnection between religious practices and involvement in religious life, on the one hand, and confessional self- identity, on the other, as well as the role of demographic statistical data (age, in particular) in shaping religious consciousness. We paid a lot of attention to the correlation between the degree of religiosity and the presence of Islamic dogmas in everyday life.
Our studies brought us to a conclusion that the faithful generally tend to overestimate the extent of their religiosity. This means that the majority of our respondents can be described as conventional believers whose knowledge of the main Islamic dog- mas is weak and who do not observe religious practices. Religious holidays and fasting are the two most frequently observed practices; praying and religious clothes are the two frequently avoided practices. Their performance requires a lot of time and the need to change appearance and lifestyle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: “The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010-2050,” available at [https://www. pewforum.org/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050], 2 March, 2021

E. Baydarov, “Globalizatsia i Islam: problemy i protivorechia,” Mir cheloveka. Filosofskiy i obshchestvenno-gumantarny zhurnal. No. 1 (51), 2012, pp. 32-37.

See: “Itogi natsionalnoy perepisi naselenia 2009 goda,” available at [https://stat.gov.kz/census/national/2009/general], 2 March, 2021.

See: A.N. Nysanbaev, E.E. Burova, A. Saylaubekkyzy, “Osobennosti identichnosti kazakhstantsev v usliviiakh polikulturnogo obshchestva,” Sotsialogicheskie issledovania, No. 7, 2019, pp. 37-47.

See: Religioznye konversii v postsekuliarnom obshchestve (opyt fenomenologicheskoi rekonstruktsii), Collective monograph, ed. by A.Kh. Bizhanov, Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Religious Studies KN MON, Almaty, 2017, 431 pp

See: M.K. Bektenova, Formirovanie islamskoi identichno sti v postsekuliarnom obshchestve: kazakhstanskie realii. Doctoral (PhD) thesis: 6D020600—Religious Studies.—Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Religious Studies, Almaty, 2017, 135 pp.

See: M.S. Shaykemelev, “Kazakhskaia identichnost v kontekste modernizatsii obshchestva,” Monograph [Second revised and enlarged edition], Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Religious Studies KN MON RK, Almaty, 2020, 230 pp.; N. Tutinova, B. Meirbayev, A. Frolov, K. Bagasharov, “Republic of Kazakhstan: Ethnoreligious Identity as an Integration Factor,” Central Asia and the Caucasus. English Edition, Vol. 20, Issue 4, 2019, pp. 147-160.

See: Қоғамдық сананы жаңғырту міндеттері аясындағы қазақстандық бірегейлікті қалыптастыру: 3 кітап (Formation of Kazakhstan Identity in the Context of Modernization of Public Consciousness. Book 3), IFPR KN MON RK, Almaty, 2020, 668 pp. (in Kazakh).

See: Қазақстандағы діни бірегейліктің инклюзивтілігі мен эксклюзивтілігі мәселелері: Ұжымдық монография (Problems of Exclusiveness of Religious Identity in Kazakhstan: collective monograph), IFPR KN MON RK, Almaty, 2020, 236 pp. (in Kazakh).

See: G.M. Dosanova, Zhenskaia religioznost i novye musulmanskie praktiki v Kazakhstane, Doctoral (PhD) thesis: 22.00.00—Sociological sciences.—Lev Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, 2010, 129 pp.

See: M. Uskembayeva, T. Rezvushkina, Polozhenie devushek i zhenshchin v kontekste religioznoi situatsii v Kazakhstane. Gendernoe issledovanie. Аkvfns, 2018, 306 pp.

G.S. Shirokalova, O.K. Shimanskaia, A.V. Anikina, “Sushchestvuiut li gendernye osobennosti religiznosti studencheskoy molodezhi?” Sotsiologicheskie issledovania, No. 6, 2016, p. 78.

V. Bakrac, M. Blagievic, “Konventsionalnaia religioznost molodezhi Chernogori.” Sotsiologicheskie issledovania, No. 12, 2014, p. 106.

See: A.I. Kirillova, “Vovlechennost v religioznye praktiki kak faktor integratsii migrantov,” Sotsiologicheskie issledovania, No. 2, 2016, pp. 119-128.

See: E.I. Grishayeva, O.M. Farkhitdinova, V.A. Shumkova, “Religioznost veruiushchikh Ekaterinburgskoi metropolii: ot ortodoksii k postsekuliarnoy eklektike,” Sotsiologicheskie issledovania, No. 8, 2017, pp. 106-117.

See: E.I. Arinin, D.I. Petrosian, “Osobennosti religioznosti studentov,” Sotsiologicheskie issledovania, No. 6, 2016, pp. 71-77; S.V. Ryzhova, “Osobennosti izuchenia religioznoi indentichnosti rossian,” Sotsiologicheskie issledovania, No.10, 2016, pp. 118-127.

See: V. Bakrac, M. Blagievic, op. cit., pp. 104-110.

See: V.G. Pivovarov, Religioznost: opyt i problema izuchenia, Mary Book Publishers, Yoshkar-Ola, 1976, 184 pp.

See: M. Uskembayeva, T. Rezvushkina, op.cit.

G.R. Boltanova, Musulmanka, Logos, Moscow, 2007, 376 pp.

G.S. Shirokalova, O.K. Shimanskaia, A.V. Anikina, op. cit., p.80.

See: C.Y. Glock, R. Stark, Religion and Society in Tension, Chicago, 1965.

See: D.O. Beliaev, “Opyt empiricheskogo issledovania geterodoksalnoy religioznosti v sovremennoy Rossii”, Sotsiologicheskie issledovania, No. 11, 2009, pp. 88-98.

See: E.I. Grishayeva, O.M. Farkhitdinova, V.A. Shumkova, op.cit.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

BOLYSBAYEVA, A., BOLYSBAYEVA, A., ZATOV, K., & TUTINOVA, N. (2021). FEMALE RELIGIOSITY IN POST-SECULAR SOCIETY: ISLAM IN KAZAKHSTAN. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 22(2), 174-188. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/715

Plaudit

Similar Articles

51-60 of 293

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.