TURKISH POLICY IN THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS

Authors

  • Valeria GIANJUMIAN Post-Graduate Student, Chair of World Politics and International Relations,Russian-Armenian (Slavic) University (Erevan, Armenia) Author

Keywords:

Turkey, the Southern Caucasus, geopolitical interests, foreign policy course, the Zero Problems with Our Neighbors policy, the Justice and Development Party, the Ankara-Tbilisi-Baku axis, Armenian-Turkish normalization.

Abstract

Today, the Southern Caucasus is best described as a scene of geopolitical battles among Russia, Turkey, and Iran, as well as between the United States and the European Union. Each of the actors is pursuing its own political interests and nurturing its own ideas about the routes leading to the region’s stability and its incorporation into the world community. To achieve this and to arrive at pragmatic political decisions fully tuned to the geopolitical realities, political scientists and other experts in international relations must study and identify the geopolitical trends prevailing in the Southern Caucasus in the context of Turkish geostrategy in the region.

The author analyzes the transformations in Turkey’s foreign policy based on the Zero Problems with Our Neighbors policy formulated by the republic’s former Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, which make Turkey’s more active involvement in all spheres of its foreign political activities, building the Ankara-Tbilisi-Baku geopolitical axis as part of the Zero Problems with Our Neighbors policy, and establishing relations with Armenia a far from simple process. The first steps along this road have been taken: Turkey has formulated a Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Platform; Armenia and Turkey have signed a roadmap and the Zurich Protocols (the ratification of which was suspended by the National Assembly of Armenia), while Ankara has been seeking brokerage in the Karabakh conflict. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: M. Aydin, “Twenty Years Before, Twenty Years After: Turkish Foreign Policy at the Threshold of the 21st Century,” in: Turkish Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. A Changing Role in World Politics, ed. by T. Ismael, M. Aydin,Ashgate, Burlington, 2003, pp. 16-17.

See, for example: S.E. Cornell, “Checking Putin’s Eurasian Ambitions,” available at [online.wsj.com/news/articles/

B10001424052702303532704579476972067682740].

See: A. Davutoğlu, Stratejik Derinlik (Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu), Istanbul, 2001.

See: “Policy of Zero Problems with our Neighbors,” available at [www.mfa.gov.tr/policy-of-zero-problems-with-our-neighbors.en.mfa].

See: “Cumhurbaşkanı Aliyev ABD Dışişleri Bakanlığı Yetkilisini Kabul Etti,” available at [www.1news.com.tr/

zerbaycan/siyaset/20130605102354059.html].

See: “Bay bay Nabucco!,” available at [hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/printnews.aspx?DocID=23594472].

“Türkiye, Azerbaycan ve Gürcistan Kura’da Buluşacak,” available at [http://www.ardahanhaberleri.com/haber/3862/

urkiye-azerbaycan-ve-gurcistan-kurada-bulusacak].

See: “Türkiye-Gürcistan-Azerbaycan Üçlü Zirvesi Başladıw,” available at [ww.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/170/89419/

urkiyegurcistan azerbaycan-uclu-zirvesi-basladi.html].

See: “General Assembly Adopts Resolution Calling Upon States Not To Recognize Changes in Status of Crimea

Region,” available at [www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2014/ga11493.doc.htm].

See: T.D. Adams, “Caspian Oil and Gas Development and the Black Sea Region: An Overview,” in: Europe’s Black Sea Dimension, CEPS, Brussels, 2002, pp. 47-52, 60-68.

See: “Caspian Forum Brussels 2014,” available at [www.caspianforum.org/news/caspian_forum_brussels_2014_563.

spx].

See: “S tseliu stroitelstva zh/d Kars-Akhalkalaki-Tbilisi budet ob’iavlen mezhdunarodny tender,” available at [www.

egnum.ru /news/602097.html].

See: “Turtsia i Azerbaijan vozmozhno prisoediniatsia k sovmestnym gruzino-amerikanskim voennym ucheniiam,”available at [mca.su/v-mire/blizhnij-vostok/turciya-blizhnij-vostok/turciya-i-azerbajdzhan-vozmozhno-prisoedinyatsya-k-sovmestnym-gruzino-amerikanskim-voennym-ucheniyam/].

“‘Odna natsia, edinaia armiia’: Baku i Ankara formiruiut edinuiu armiiu,” available at [www.regnum.ru/news/

olit/1691679.html]; [https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=623806141010105&id=558590324198354].

See: “NATO podtalkivaet Azerbaijan i Turtsiiu k zakliucheniiu voennogo soglashenia?,” available at [news.am/rus/news/202069.html].

See: “Trabzon Declaration,” Trabzon, 8 June, 2012, available at [http://www.mfa.gov.az, http://www.mfa.gov.tr,http://www.mfa.gov.ge].

O. Bengur, “Turkey’s Image and the Armenian Question,” Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 1, Spring 2009, p. 45.

“Erdoğan Pledges New Reforms Amid Mounting Western Criticism on Rights,” available at [http://www.todayszaman.

om/news-346809-erdogan-pledges-new-reforms-amid-mounting-western-criticism-on-rights.html].

See: “Prezident Armenii otvetil Erdoganu,” available at [www.voskanapat.info/?p=7419].

Downloads

Published

2014-06-30

Issue

Section

GEOPOLITICS AND SECURITY

How to Cite

GIANJUMIAN, V. (2014). TURKISH POLICY IN THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 15(3), 103-111. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1665

Plaudit

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1182

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.