Political and socio-economics reforms of Kassym Tokayev from 2019 to 2021

Authors

  • M. A. Krystian Pachucki-Włosek Doctoral School in the Social Sciences Institute of Russia and Eastern Europe Jagiellonian University (Cracow, Poland) Author

Keywords:

Kassym Tokayev, reforms, society, participation, Republic of Kazakhstan.

Abstract

The fundamental expectation of Kazakh society from the authorities after the collapse of the USSR was to overcome the economic crisis and build a solid foundation for undisturbed development. Hence, the domestic policy of the first president Nursultan Nazarbayev focused primarily on economic issues. Attracting foreign capital and increasing the price of oil improved the macroeconomic situation, thus making it possible to satisfy physiological and security needs. Political efforts to integrate all ethnicity under the banner of an independent Kazakhstan partially satisfied the need for belonging. The provision of these three basic needs according to Maslow's pyramid contributed to the intensification of social aspirations, manifested by an increase in the desire of the population to participate in socio-political life. President Nazarbayev, as a politician who was shaped by the Soviet system, could not imagine the possibility of sharing power with society. This led to growing social discontent and, combined with the economic crisis, could have led to the outbreak of protests. Awareness of his own limitations led to his resignation as president after twenty-eight years in office.
As his successor, he appointed the long-time foreign minister Kassym Jomart- Tokayev. Tokayev, in order to meet the expectations of the people of Kazakhstan, declared readiness to carry out reforms already during the election campaign. In his program, he abandoned the slogan of Nazarbayev first the economy in favor of changes in politics and the economy must run parallel. The main slogan of the new policy became the increase of participation in political and social life of the country, desired by the society.
The main objective of the article is to determine the actual translation of reforms undertaken by Kassym Jomart-Tokayev in 2019-2021 on increasing public participation in the socio-political life of the state. An important aspect is also to determine the level of compatibility between the declared assumptions and their implementation. Low compatibility of the implemented transformations with social demands became one of the reasons for the outbreak of protests in January 2021.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gachechiladze, R., National idea, state-building and boundaries in the post-Soviet space (the case of Georgia). GeoJournal, 1997. 43(1): p. 51-60.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006814530090.

Yagmussova, A. and D. Baymakhanova, Basics of the legislative process in the republic of Kazakhstan. International scientific review, 2016(3): p. 144-148.

Bhattarai, M., D. Pant, and D. Molden, Socio-economics and hydrological impacts of melamchi intersectoral and interbasin water transfer project, Nepal. Water Policy, 2005. 7(2): p. 163- 180.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2005.0011.

Nazarbayev, N. and N.P. Course, Address by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Leader of the Nation. Nazarbayev “Strategy Kazakhstan-2050”: new political course of the established state” Retrieved from http://www. akorda. kz/en/page/page_address-bythe-president-of-the- republic-of-kazakhstan-leader-of-the-nation-n-nazarbayev-” strategy-kazakhstan-2050”-new- political-courseof-the-established-state” _1357813742, 2013.

Romzek, B.S. and M.J. Dubnick, Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy, in Democracy, Bureaucracy, and the Study of Administration. 2018, Routledge. p. 182- 204.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501036-13.

Ateku, A.-J., Regional intervention in the promotion of democracy in West Africa: an analysis of the political crisis in the Gambia and ECOWAS’coercive diplomacy. Conflict, Security & Development, 2020. 20(6): p. 677-696.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2020.1854954.

Matland, R.E., Enhancing women’s political participation: legislative recruitment and electoral systems. Women in parliament: Beyond numbers, 2005. 2: p. 93-111.

Dziadzio, A., The system of government in the Polish Constitution of 17 March 1921: remarks to the essay by Professor Angela Orlandi. Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo Online, 2021. 48(3).

Fierman, W., Language and identity in Kazakhstan: Formulations in policy documents 1987–1997. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 1998. 31(2): p. 171-186.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(98)00005-1.

Isaacs, R., Russia–Kazakhstan Relations and the Tokayev–Nazarbayev Tandem. Russian Analytical Digest, 2020(248): p. 2-5.

Farrell, J., Amending'the lion in the path': the hurdles, thrusts and ploys of the New State Movement in northern NSW 1920-30. Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society, 2011. 97(1): p. 44-65.

Peluso, N.L., Coercing conservation?: The politics of state resource control. Global environmental change, 1993. 3(2): p. 199-217.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(93)90006-7.

Lutz, G., Switzerland: Citizens’ initiatives as a measure to control the political agenda, in Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe. 2012, Springer. p. 17-36.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369900_2.

Kurzman, C., Structural opportunity and perceived opportunity in social-movement theory: The Iranian revolution of 1979. American Sociological Review, 1996: p. 153-170.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2096411.

Junisbai, B., A tale of two Kazakhstans: Sources of political cleavage and conflict in the post-Soviet period. Europe-Asia Studies, 2010. 62(2): p. 235-269.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130903506813.

Mulgan, A.G., Japan's political leadership deficit. Australian Journal of Political Science, 2000.35(2): p. 183-202.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713649327.

Mykhailiuk, G. and L.A. DiMatteo, Creating a comprehensive peaceful assembly law for Ukraine: Idea and ideal. New Perspectives, 2021. 29(1): p. 45-68.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X20983743.

Podoprigora, R., Religion in Kazakhstan: A general view. BYU L. Rev., 1999: p. 581.

Jackson, J.H., Sovereignty-modern: a new approach to an outdated concept. American Journal of International Law, 2003. 97(4): p. 782-802.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3133680.

Neunreither, K., The democratic deficit of the European Union: towards closer cooperation between the European Parliament and the national parliaments. Government and opposition, 1994. 29(3): p. 299-314.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1994.tb01223.x.

Nurtazina, R.A. and A.T. Serikzhanova, Political involvement o of citizens of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan on the example of parliamentary elections: comparative analysis. ВJournalist of the Eurasian National University. LN Gumilyov. Series: Political sciences. Regional studies. Oriental studies. Turkology, 2021(2): p. 51-70.DOI: https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-6887/2021-135-2-51-69.

McElroy, G. and K. Benoit, Party policy and group affiliation in the European Parliament. British Journal of Political Science, 2010. 40(2): p. 377-398.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990469.

Alt, J.E. and D.D. Lassen, Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review, 2006. 50(6): p. 1403-1439.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.04.001.

Xingwu, L., China's Policy Towards Her Minority Nationalities. Social Scientist, 1988: p. 136- 159.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3517385.

Horch, H.-D., On the socio-economics of voluntary organisations. Voluntas: international journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations, 1994. 5(2): p. 219-230.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353987.

Satpayev, D., Political and economic trends in Kazakhstan. Central Asia Policy Brief, 2016. 32: p. 1-5.

Storm, S., Lessons for the Age of Consequences: COVID-19 and the Macroeconomy. Review of Political Economy, 2021: p. 1-40.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2021.1985779.

Walder, A.G., Workers, managers and the state: the reform era and the political crisis of 1989. The China Quarterly, 1991. 127: p. 467-492.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000031039.

Spoor, M., L. Tasciotti, and M. Peleah, Quality of life and social exclusion in rural Southern, Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS. Post-Communist Economies, 2014. 26(2): p. 201-219.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2014.904107.

Nugumanova, L., et al., Environmental problems and policies in Kazakhstan: Air pollution, waste and water. 2017, IOS Working Papers.

Poulton, C., A. Dorward, and J. Kydd, The future of small farms: New directions for services, institutions, and intermediation. World development, 2010. 38(10): p. 1413-1428.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.009.

Kumar, P., et al., Multi-level impacts of the COVID-19 lockdown on agricultural systems in India: The case of Uttar Pradesh. Agricultural Systems, 2021. 187: p. 103027.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103027.

Robinson, S. and E.J. Milner-Gulland, Political change and factors limiting numbers of wild and domestic ungulates in Kazakhstan. Human Ecology, 2003. 31(1): p. 87-110.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022834224257.

Janenova, S. and C. Knox, Civil service reform in Kazakhstan: trajectory to the 30 most developed countries? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2019. 85(3): p. 419-439.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317722397.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-30

How to Cite

Pachucki-Włosek, M. A. K. (2022). Political and socio-economics reforms of Kassym Tokayev from 2019 to 2021. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 23(1), 235-243. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/57

Plaudit

Similar Articles

1-10 of 271

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.