MENTAL HEALTH WELL-BEING POLICY AND STRATEGY IN THE WORKPLACE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (UK): LESSON TO BE LEARNED
Keywords:
Mental Health, Well-Being Policy, Framework of Standards, Thriving at Work, WorkplaceAbstract
Mental health problems in the workplace impinge on extensive diversity of interest. Such wide repercussion can be seen in the loss, which the employees suffer because they are losing job due to high absenteeism and poor performance. Family dependent on employees also suffers once they are unemployed and need to care for them if the mental illness conditions exacerbated, while the employers may endure reduction in productivity due to employees’ mental health issues. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has emphasized on the important role of the government and the employers in promoting mental health well-being at an early stage. In Malaysia, there is no specific law or policy toward mental health in the workplace, unlike the UK in the presence of the law and policy, the government has introduced Thriving at Work; an independent review, which focuses on how organizations can better support employees’ mental health. This paper aims to discuss the policy and the framework of standards embedded under the said review in the UK. It also examines on how employers can address and prevent mental illness. This paper applies qualitative method. The data are collected from primary and secondary sources derived from Acts, cases, policy papers, reports and articles from law and non-law journals, and reviews. This paper concludes that the policy and Thriving at Work introduced in the UK if emulated by companies and organizations in Malaysia not only can tackle mental illness in the workplace, indeed can be one of the preventive measures to such problems.
Downloads
References
Bowie-DaBreo, D., et al., Evaluation of treatment descriptions and alignment with clinical guidance of apps for depression on app stores: systematic search and content analysis. JMIR formative research, 2020. 4(11): p. e14988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/14988.
Clark, D.M., et al., Transparency about the outcomes of mental health services (IAPT approach): an analysis of public data. The Lancet, 2018. 391(10121): p. 679-686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32133-5.
Health and E. Safety, Work related stress, anxiety and depression statistics in Great Britain 2016. 2016, HSE London.
Hitt, D., et al., The clinical effectiveness of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention in a work setting: a 5-year retrospective analysis of outcomes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 2018. 23(4): p. 360-372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117745580.
Hutchinson, J., et al., Implementing supported employment. Lessons from the making IPS work project. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. 15(7): p. 1545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071545.
Jamaiyah, H., Community mental health in Malaysia: Marriage of psychiatry and public health. Buletin Kesihatan Masyarakat Isu Khas, 2000: p. 155-166.
Lockwood, G., C. Henderson, and G. Thornicroft, Mental health disability discrimination: Law, policy and practice. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 2014. 14(3): p. 168-182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229114534541.
Moore, A., The forgotten foundations: in core mental health services, no one can hear you scream. BJPsych bulletin, 2018. 42(6): p. 225-228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2018.79.
National Collaborating Centre for Mental, H., et al., Common mental health disorders: identification and pathways to care. 2011.
O'Reilly, D., et al., Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer in adults: A summary of guidelines from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pancreatology, 2018. 18(8): p. 962-970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.09.012.
Parkin, E., Mental health policy in England: Briefing Paper: Number 07547, 5 April 2016. 2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918788880.
Pollack Porter, K.M., L. Rutkow, and E.E. McGinty, The importance of policy change for addressing public health problems. Public Health Reports, 2018. 133(1_suppl): p. 9S-14S.
Raeside, C. and J. McQueen, Getting back to work: Experiences of the individual placement and support model from those with mental health conditions, an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Work, 2021(Preprint): p. 1-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213617.
Ram, B.S., Survey: Malaysian employees are overworked, sleep deprived, unhealthy. New Straits Times, 2019.
Rusli, S., Stress at Workplace for Shift Staff (Petronas Sabah Auxiliary Police). 2020.
Shuen, Y.S., Safety communication, safety culture, and safety leadership on safety participation among manufacturing employees. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2018.
Simms, A., N.T. Fear, and N. Greenberg, The impact of having inadequate safety equipment on mental health. Occupational Medicine, 2020. 70(4): p. 278-281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaa101.
Stevenson, D., Thriving at work: The Stevenson/Farmer review of mental health and employers. Department for Work and Pensions and Department of Health, London, 2017.
Vainre, M., et al., Protocol for the Work Engagement and Well-being Study (SWELL): A randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating the effects of mindfulness versus light physical exercise at work. 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/546tk.
Wakefield, S., et al., Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 10‐years of practice‐based evidence. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2021. 60(1): p. 1-37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12259.
Wang, Z., H. Jobarah, and Z. Kaaki. Response, Retune, Revive: The Duty of Producing Never Ceases in Pandemic. OnePetro DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/207051-MS.
Westwood, S., et al., Predictors of emotional exhaustion, disengagement and burnout among improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) practitioners. Journal of mental health, 2017. 26(2): p. 172-179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2016.1276540.
Whitworth, A., Mainstreaming Effective Employment Support for Individuals with Health Conditions: An Analytical Framework for the Effective Design of Modified Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Models. Social Policy and Society, 2019. 18(4): p. 517-533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474641800043X.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
